Professional Writing

What Is AI Workslop? The Research, the Real Cost, and How to Avoid Sending It

By Simply Humanize Team · Updated October 19, 2026 · 5 min read

TL;DR

Workslop is AI-generated work that looks finished but lacks the substance to move a task forward, so the recipient has to fix it. In a 2025 survey of 1,150 US employees, 40% had received some in the past month, spending nearly two hours per instance. The fix isn't avoiding AI: it's checking, adding substance and owning what you send.

Where the Word Comes From

"Workslop" was coined in a September 2025 Harvard Business Review article by researchers at BetterUp Labs and the Stanford Social Media Lab. Their definition: "AI generated work content that masquerades as good work, but lacks the substance to meaningfully advance a given task." (HBR: AI-Generated "Workslop" Is Destroying Productivity)

It's the workplace cousin of "AI slop," the low-quality AI content flooding feeds. That word went mainstream fast: Merriam-Webster named "slop" its 2025 word of the year, and Australia's Macquarie Dictionary chose "AI slop." (AP via KFVS12, The Nightly)

What Workslop Looks Like

  • A polished project update that summarizes the meeting but contains no decision, owner or date.
  • A strategy memo with confident headings and generic advice that would fit any company.
  • A slide deck full of tidy bullet points that nobody can act on.
  • Code or analysis that looks complete but hasn't been checked, so a colleague has to find the errors.
  • An email reply that answers a slightly different question than the one you asked.

The common thread is in the researchers' sharpest line: "What a sender perceives as a loophole becomes a hole the recipient needs to dig out of." The effort doesn't disappear. It moves to the person receiving the work.

What the Research Found

The figures below come from the researchers' survey of 1,150 US full-time employees, as reported in the HBR article and BetterUp's summary. (BetterUp: Workslop)

FindingFigure
Received workslop in the past month40% of respondents
Share of received work that qualifies15.4% on average
Time spent dealing with each instanceAbout 1 hour 56 minutes
Estimated cost per employeeAbout $186 per month
Estimated cost for a 10,000-person companyOver $9 million per year
Saw the sender as less creative, capable and reliableAbout half
Saw the sender as less trustworthy42%

Most workslop moved between peers (40%), but 18% went from direct reports to managers. Professional services and technology were hit hardest. The survey relies on self-reported time and salary, so treat the dollar figures as estimates.

A 2026 follow-up reported by Fortune found 38% of desk workers receiving workslop and spending about 3.4 hours a month revising it, and more than half admitting they'd sent some themselves. (Fortune) Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke has a name for it: "slop grenades."

The Reputation Cost Is the Real Problem

Lost hours are measurable, but the trust numbers are the ones to worry about. When half your colleagues quietly downgrade their opinion of your ability after one bad document, the shortcut gets expensive. In the survey, about a third of recipients said they were less likely to want to work with the sender again.

Platforms are reacting too. In 2026, LinkedIn said it was rolling out systems to reduce the reach of generic AI-written posts and comments, limiting flagged posts mostly to the poster's direct connections. (Entrepreneur)

A Checklist Before You Send AI-Assisted Work

  • Does it advance the task? State in one sentence what the recipient can now do that they couldn't before. If you can't, it's not ready.
  • Did you check every fact, number and claim? AI fills gaps with plausible guesses.
  • Is anything in it specific to this situation? Names, dates, numbers, decisions. Generic content is the clearest sign of slop.
  • Is it shorter than the AI made it? Cut restatements, filler introductions and summary paragraphs.
  • Would you sign it without the AI? If you'd be uncomfortable defending a sentence in a meeting, rewrite or delete it.
  • Does it sound like you? Colleagues know how you write. Our 10-point "does this sound like AI" check takes two minutes.

What Teams and Managers Can Do

The researchers warn against blanket "use AI everywhere" mandates, which they say model a lack of discernment. Their advice is to set clear norms for acceptable use, frame AI as a collaborator rather than a shortcut, and hold AI-assisted work to the same standard as everything else. They contrast "pilots," who use AI purposefully, with "passengers," who use it to avoid work.

  • Agree on where AI drafts are fine (first drafts, summaries for yourself) and where they need heavy review (client work, decisions).
  • Ask for the decision or recommendation first, the polish second.
  • Make it normal to say "I used AI for the first draft and checked X, Y and Z."

Where Humanizing Fits (and Where It Doesn't)

Let's be clear about what a tool like ours can do. Simply Humanize rewrites robotic phrasing and uneven rhythm so an AI-assisted draft reads naturally. That's useful once the substance is right. It can't add the substance: the decision, the data, the judgment. Polishing workslop just produces better-sounding workslop.

So the order matters: think first, draft with AI if it helps, check and add specifics, then fix the voice. For business writing specifically, see our page on AI humanizing for businesses, and for the bigger question of why so much text now sounds the same, read why everything sounds like ChatGPT.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is AI workslop?

AI-generated work content that looks like good work but lacks the substance to move a task forward, so the person receiving it has to redo or fix it. The term was coined in a 2025 Harvard Business Review article by BetterUp Labs and Stanford Social Media Lab researchers.

How common is workslop?

In the original survey of 1,150 US full-time employees, 40% said they had received workslop in the past month, and an average of 15.4% of the content they received qualified.

How much does workslop cost?

The researchers estimated about two hours lost per incident and about $186 per employee per month, or over $9 million a year for a 10,000-person company. These are estimates based on self-reported time and salary.

What's the difference between AI slop and workslop?

AI slop usually means low-quality AI content online, such as social media posts and videos. Workslop is the workplace version: memos, reports, slides and code that look finished but aren't useful.

How do I avoid sending workslop?

Check that the work advances the task, verify every fact, add specifics, cut filler, and only send what you would defend without the AI. Then make sure it sounds like you.